Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Wanda M. Walker's avatar

I truly enjoyed participating in today's launch of the 'Working Class' review session.

I agree with Mr. Landrieu that we've moved away from our strengths of direct engagement with voters. I would attribute it to 'the politics of maximising the spend' and targeting without local leadership. Now, I say all this, as an observant voter (with a little bit of experience).

Campaigns appear to have moved to robo calls and commercials for their outreach and it just doesn't feel the same -- and keep in mind that you already have my attention. In the 12 years since I've been back from abroad, I have never seen a single candidate or canvasser. So, I can only imagine how others feel.

It had always been working knowledge (a long time ago) that people were more likely to turn out for candidates who reached their door. So, I would have mine write a personal handwritten note or personally sign batches of lit, that the candidate, field workers or the canvassers would drop. Having a bulk mail delivery doesn't achieve the same ends.(And yes, it can be done at the presidential level.)

As for the candidate, I think people want someone who can command the room; yet focus on and engage an individual ( think Clinton, Biden, Obama). I think that they want someone who people will follow (e.g. exudes leadership (quiet or assertive), someone who is deliberative and witty- think Mexican president Sheinbaum 80+ approval rating).

Ultimately, they need to believe that the candidate has their back, even if they don't have shared experiences.

As for delivering a message, I believe that all candidates should be open to, and encouraged to take sessions to review their oratory and engagement skills. It's not uncommon.

Those are my two cents. Thank you.

Expand full comment
Wanda M. Walker's avatar

Speaking metaphorically, everyone wants to ride in the flashy red sports car with spoilers and low suspension, rather than the 7- seater blue mini van. It's only when the red sports car breaks down, and the blue mini van has to go pick them up, that people appreciate the reliability. To my mind, that's been the endless cycle of Rep. - Dem. presidential transfers over the last 50 years.

-- I'd say that our wins have been most significant when we've had a big programmatic plan, which was self-defining (i.e., the New Deal, the Marshall Plan, Peace Corps, Civil Rights, etc.).

-- What I read from your respondents is that they want decisiveness, direction and their vested interests taken into account. It appears to me that they want a unified message delivered through a single individual with commanding knowledge of the programming that will lift them out of their condition, whatever that may be. Someone who speaks plainly and explains the game and shares with them how we can help them achieve their goals. They don't want to see the divisions and fractures.

-- The Republicans are good at associative wordplay, case in point, 'woke'. The Dems have got to flip that script. Since there are certain connotations for their wealth connections, reformulating certain phrases such as "tax the rich" might be expressed as "luxury tax" and "for lowering taxes" use "lowering working class taxes". This might help in targeting the 'excessive' wealth messaging and buttress supporting the working class.

I appreciate all of your efforts. Go Dems!

Expand full comment
9 more comments...

No posts